The Shame Wall
Legislators who do not accept a fax.
Ten members of the 119th Congress — out of 538 — have a public fax number at their Washington, DC office. The rest require you to use a web contact form, which many staffers rarely read. The chart below shows public fax coverage in the states we target, so you can see which legislators are willing to receive constituent mail the old-fashioned way and which are not.
“Your representative does not even have a fax machine” is not an argument against fax. It is an argument against your representative.
The Headline Numbers
As of March 30, 2026
(916) 319-21XX and (916) 651-49XXU.S. Congress
The Ten Who Kept Their DC Fax Line
These are the only members of the 119th Congress with a fax number listed at their Washington, DC office. Everyone else — both parties, both chambers — has abandoned the machine.
| Legislator | Chamber | State | DC Fax |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edward J. Markey | Senate | MA | 202-228-0769 |
| Adam B. Schiff | Senate | CA | 202-228-0026 |
| Christopher H. Smith | House | NJ | 202-225-7768 |
| Richard Hudson | House | NC | 202-225-4036 |
| Thom Tillis | Senate | NC | 202-228-2563 |
| Rick Scott | Senate | FL | 202-228-4535 |
| Tommy Tuberville | Senate | AL | 202-225-0562 |
| John W. Hickenlooper | Senate | CO | 202-224-3115 |
| Cliff Bentz | House | OR | 202-225-5774 |
| Raphael G. Warnock | Senate | GA | 202-228-0724 |
Federal Delegation Fax Coverage — Target States
Source: unitedstates/congress-legislators, public domain.
| State | Members | DC Fax | District Fax | Any Fax | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA — AB 1043 (enacted) | 53 | 1 | 23 | 24 | 45% |
| CO — SB 26-051 (Senate passed) | 10 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 30% |
| IL — SB 3977 (in committee) | 19 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 53% |
| LA — HB 570 (enacted) | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12% |
| NY — S8102A (in committee) | 28 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 32% |
| TX — SB 2420 (enjoined) | 40 | 0 | 16 | 16 | 40% |
| UT — SB 142 (stayed) | 6 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 33% |
State Legislatures
California Is the Outlier
Both chambers of the California Legislature use predictable, sequential Capitol fax numbers — Assembly: (916) 319-21XX and Senate: (916) 651-49XX, where XX is the zero-padded district number (01–80 and 01–40, respectively). Every published fax number matched the pattern exactly during verification. This gives 120 out of 120 (100%) California state legislators with a computable Capitol fax number.
No other target state has an algorithmic fax pattern. Texas Senate has patterned phone numbers, but fax numbers are non-patterned. Every non-California state below is a gap.
| State | Legislators | Open States fax data | Algorithmic? | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | 120 | 0 | YES | 100% |
| Colorado | 100 | 0 | No | 0% |
| Illinois | 177 | 1 | No | 1% |
| Louisiana | 141 | 1 | No | 1% |
| New York | 213 | 39 | No | 18% |
| Texas | 180 | 0 | No | 0% |
| Utah | 104 | 0 | No | 0% |
Source: Open States / Plural Policy bulk CSVs, CC0 public domain, downloaded March 2026. “Algorithmic” coverage is only claimed after manual verification of sample numbers against individual member websites.
Why This Matters
The Statute The Project Exists to Oppose
AB 1043 passed the California Legislature 76-0 in the Assembly and 38-0 in the Senate. Not a single legislator voted no. Every person at the Capitol who had the chance to slow the bill down decided it was fine. Every single one.
If your state legislator represents part of California, we have a Capitol fax number for them. There is no technical reason you cannot send them a fax about AB 1043 before January 1, 2027. The Fax Your Rep form assembles the message. The Capitol fax machine picks up, every time, 9-to-5 Pacific.
If your federal representative does not have a DC fax number, that is a choice they made — one that every other legislator on the list above also made, and that the project interprets as a preference for contact-form filtering. Send to their district office fax if they have one, or use the ffwf.net contact form and we will help route it. If they do not have any fax number, consider that data point. The statute they vote on requires a real-time age-verification API on every operating system in the state. The office they run cannot maintain a fax line.
Data and Sources
Where the numbers come from
| Source | Format | License |
|---|---|---|
| unitedstates/congress-legislators | YAML | Public domain |
| Open States / Plural Policy | CSV | Public domain (CC0) |
| CA Assembly member sites | HTML | Public record |
CA Senate member sites (sd{NN}.senate.ca.gov) | HTML | Public record |
Full coverage report with per-state analysis, federal fax gap strategy, and
launch-tier recommendations:
agelesslinux/data/FAX_COVERAGE_REPORT.md in the
project repository.